Archive for February, 2005

Brian McLaren’s Call to Make Christ Our Lord

Monday, February 28th, 2005

I have been accused of being an emergent Christian, and since I don’t understand what that means, I don’t know whether to be offended or flattered. Hence, I’m reading A Generous Orthodoxy by Brian McLaren to learn about post-modern emergent Christian theology.

Early in the book, McLaren makes some statements that go to the heart of the Lordship of Jesus Christ (or lack thereof) among American Christians. Here are a couple excerpts, beginning with some statements that McLaren says could be made today (pages 79-80):
(more…)

Bono for President of the World Bank

Friday, February 25th, 2005

The Los Angeles Times has an editorial proposing Bono as the next President for the World Bank.

Bono, the U2 rock star, has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, and he is a credible candidate. But we have a better idea on how best to recognize his effective lobbying on behalf of African development — Bono should be named the next president of the World Bank.
(more…)

Wallis is Mobilizing a Movement

Wednesday, February 23rd, 2005

I had the pleasure of hearing Jim Wallis speak at an event on his book tour for God’s Politics. The event was held at a church next door to an evangelical seminary, so much of the audience were seminary students and faculty. However, judging by the attendees who introduced themselves during the Q&A, there were also mainline Christians like me, and even a few agnostic social activists.

I was expecting a typical book tour speech. Instead, I sat enthralled through a one-hour sermon, and not a polite mainline protestant sermon, but a rousing revival-meeting sermon. The audience interrupted Wallis repeatedly with enthusiastic applause, cheers and amens as he spoke about a Christianity that is “personal but never private”, with moral values that address far more than just abortion and gay marriage, and that is called by Christ to fulfill the commission of Matthew 25 to feed the hungry, care for the sick and comfort the oppressed. While much of what he said is contained in God’s Politics, Wallis is not about selling books, but about mobilizing a movement to combat poverty, hunger and war.
(more…)

God Bless America…and the Whole World

Tuesday, February 22nd, 2005

This past Sunday, Pastor Tony Auer gave a sermon on the gospel text from the lectionary, which included the well-known John 3:16 verse. I found his sermon prophetic, and would like to share an excerpt that particularly moved me:

“For God so loved the world, he gave his only Son, so that all those who believe in him should not perish but have eternal life.”

We have all seen, and maybe we have on our car, a bumper sticker that says, “God Bless America”. What does that mean? America already has one of the highest per capita incomes in the world. We have one of the highest standards of living in the world, we already consume two-thirds of the world’s natural resources. What does “God Bless America” mean? Bless us with more?

Yes, 3,000 Americans died in the World Trade Center and another 1400 have died in Iraq, and that is a tragedy. But that many people die in a week in Africa due to genocide, AIDS and starvation. Over 250,000 persons died because of the tsunami. When we say “God Bless America”, are we being exclusive? Wouldn’t we like God to bless Africa, and bring an end to genocide, war and starvation? Wouldn’t we like God to bless the survivors and the victims of the tsunami? Wouldn’t we like God to bless the Iraqi people who have suffered far greater loss than we have? If God so loved the world, wouldn’t we want God to bless the whole world, with no exceptions?

Keep your God Bless America bumper sticker, but maybe you should add to it: God Bless America…and the whole world, no exceptions.

For God so loved the world, he gave his only Son, that through him all people of the world might have life and salvation. The Son is sent out of love. The purpose of the Son’s mission is not condemnation of those outside the “club”, but salvation for all the people of the world. God comes to us to bring us life not death. To bring us life now and in the future.

Blogophilia

Saturday, February 19th, 2005

Some new (to me) progressive Christian blogs this week:

  • The Grace Pages has a post about the imminent return of heresy trials in the Church of England for, among other things, preaching a liberal doctrine regarding gays. Hopefully they won’t be bringing back the stake as well.
  • I just discovered The Feminarian, who happens to live in the same suburb of a major US city as I do, and is apparently attending seminary with several friends of mine. Regardless of the its-a-small-blogosphere set of coincidences, she has an engrossing series on Christian sex (!!), starting with this post.
  • A new progressive Lutheran blog, FaithandPolicy, has a post with a quote from Ann Coulter, refuting which is the entire purpose of my blog and many like it. David counters with quotes from Luke and Martin Luther, both a bit more knowledgeable than Ann.
  • From the Parish, a concept for a Christian magazine that I would not only read, but pay money for. As for a title, how about Progressive Christian: the magazine of the Progressive Christian Bloggers Network. Joking, but only kind of.

Griping About Blog Storms

Friday, February 18th, 2005

By now you’ve probably seen the Gary Brolsma Numa Numa video, and either found it hilarious (me) or just shrugged (my brother.) Apart from the comic value of lip-synching to Hungarian techno pop, what fascinates me is the nature of this blog storm. Think of this from poor Gary’s point of view: he makes a video and puts it on his blog for the amusement of a close circle of friends and visitors to his blog; the video sweeps exponentially through the blogosphere for reasons that are hard to pin down, other than its funny (kind of); Gary (I’m guessing) sees his web hosting bandwidth cap obliterated, and has to turn off his blog to avoid paying huge overage charges; NBC Today picks it up, and he is on national television, reaching people that have never heard of a blog, don’t know what techno is, and can’t find Hungary on a map. The sad thing is that, most likely, this 19 year-old has already peaked. His 15 minutes are over, and he will never again experience anything quite like this again. Ten, twenty years from now, his video will get 15 seconds in a VH1 nostalgia retrospective.
(more…)

Borowitz: Bush Reaffirms Support for Global Warming

Thursday, February 17th, 2005

From the Borowitz Report:

BUSH REAFFIRMS SUPPORT FOR GLOBAL WARMING
Makes Earth a ‘Homier’ Place, President Says

On the day that the U.N. Kyoto Protocol finally went into effect, President George W. Bush reaffirmed his strong support for global warming, arguing that the phenomenon helps to make the world a “toastier, homier” place.

“Right now, Hawaii has a climate that is the envy of the world,” Mr. Bush said at a White House briefing. “If global warming continues at its current pace, by 2050 the whole world will be as hot as Hawaii, if not hotter.”

President Bush added that global warming – far from being the threat to the world’s eco-system that many experts say it is — may actually be the best long-term solution to the world’s energy problems.

“If the world got a few degrees warmer every year, we wouldn’t have to turn up the darned thermostat so much,” Mr. Bush said. “Thanks to global warming, the world will be a toastier, homier place.”

Mr. Bush said that each and every American can do his or her part to help increase global warming, adding, “Instead of walking to the corner, drive your SUV.”

“A lot of folks think they can’t do much to produce greenhouse gasses, but that’s just not true,” Mr. Bush said. “Every little bit helps.”

Global Campaign Against Poverty

Wednesday, February 16th, 2005

You may have noticed the white banners with the slogan “MakePovertyHistory.org” on some of your favorite blogs. Richard and Mike at connexions cleared up the mystery. It turns out that MakePovertyHistory.org is a UK-based campaign affiliated with the Global Call to Action Against Poverty, or GCAP. GCAP is supported by a long list of international NGOs including World Vision, the Micah Challenge and Oxfam, and is an umbrella group for various national campaigns against poverty.

The US national campaign is called The ONE Campaign. From its website:

What is The ONE Campaign?
ONE is a new effort by Americans to rally Americans ONE by ONE to fight the emergency of global AIDS and extreme poverty. The ONE Campaign is engaging Americans through a diverse coalition of faith-based and anti-poverty organizers to show the steps people can take, ONE by ONE, to fight global AIDS and poverty. (more…)

Bush’s Immoral Budget

Monday, February 14th, 2005

Some expressions of moral outrage at Bush’s spending priorities:

A Washington Post editorial calls the budget “breathtaking”.

To meet its claimed target of cutting the deficit in half by 2009, the new budget omits the cost of the war in Iraq; the cost of the president’s proposed private accounts for Social Security; and the cost of correcting the alternative minimum tax, which is hitting growing numbers of middle-class taxpayers rather than the rich it is intended for.

To make its already unaffordable tax cuts permanent, the administration wants to change the budget-scoring rules so that the cuts show up on the score card as cost-free. In fact, making them permanent would cost $1.1 trillion over the next 10 years… (more…)

Garrison Keillor on the ELCA Sexuality Task Force

Monday, February 14th, 2005

From the January 22nd show of A Prairie Home Companion, courtesy of Tony.

“Pastor Ingqvist was so glad about the snow. He was thinking he might have to do a sermon on the Lutheran church, its announcement of its commission on its position on same-sex relationships and the ordination of same-sex people. But then he thought, “No, I don’t really need to do that. People are thinking about snow.” Nobody had really asked him about this commission report, which was a masterpiece of muddling through – just a masterpiece. It was a beautiful piece of writing. It’s a case where you establish a commission to take up a question that militants on either side are waving their bright shining swords, and (more…)

Testing My Moral Politics

Monday, February 14th, 2005

Thanks to the Big Lowitzki for the heads-up to this site: the Moral Politics Test. Here are my results, but I have to say that I think something is missing in their classification scheme. I have no problems with capitalism per se, and plenty of problems with socialism, so I’m not too pleased about being called a borderline socialist.

moral politics test results

(more…)

Blogophilia

Sunday, February 13th, 2005

A few things I’m reading in the blogs these days:

  • Lefty and Father Jake both address abortion, and both in personal and profound ways. I share their struggle with this issue.
  • Progressive Christian has a post about what sounds like a wonderful play written by a high school student that was blasted by a State delegate for promoting a gay lifestyle.
  • Andy Borowitz at the Borowitz Report has a satirical look at one more effort to keep marriage safe.
  • Carlos and Lefty (again) have posts about a seminar, the first in a series, given by the National Association of Evangelicals at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, where they distance themselves from the conservative Christian excesses past and present.
  • Steve at Gutless and Chuck Currie comment on Bush’s immoral budget (I’m sure I’ll be posting on this as well at some point.)

Update: This just in…kitten-eating America-and-Jesus hating liberals exposed!

American Idols

Saturday, February 12th, 2005

PBS’ Religion and Ethics Newsweekly had a segment this week on the US Supreme Court and the Ten Commandments. The high court will be hearing a case on whether the ten commandments can be displayed on government property.

flag-crossWhat struck me during this segment was this photograph, shown as the voice of what I assume was a conservative Christian protesting in favor of the display of the ten commandments was heard, saying “We’re here today to sound the alarm of the dying of a nation.” Does anyone else find this photograph offensive? How should I characterize this conflating of a 200 year-old symbol of a human institution with a 2000 year-old symbol of divine redemption? Let me think…how about idolatrous? The irony is just too much. From Exodus 20: (more…)

Part 3 – Social Security Reform

Wednesday, February 9th, 2005

Social SecurityIn my first post on Social Security, I explained that Social Security is not a retirement savings plan, but a retirement welfare plan. In my second post, I explained why private savings accounts are not better than the current system at guaranteeing a safety net for seniors. In this post, I will debunk another one of Bush’s grand deceptions: that Social Security will be costing the government money in 2018. An example of this fallacy is the following from Fox News (for more, see the write-up from Media Matters):

HUME: …So what is the consequence of the fact that the Treasury owes this money to Social Security, and Social Security will need it starting in 2018 to pay benefits?

ANGLE: Well, it tells you what kind of pressure there will be to fix the system.

HUME: Well, I know. But I mean it does mean that the money will have to be raised by either what? Raising taxes or?

ANGLE: We’re going to have to raise taxes or borrow more money. You’re talking about years. (more…)

Voices in Response to the ELCA Sexuality Task Force

Monday, February 7th, 2005

While I know you can hardly wait for yet another lengthy post on Social Security reform (don’t worry, it’s coming), here’s an update on another topic. The Lutheran Magazine’s March issue has a special report on the ELCA’s Sexuality Task Force’s recent recommendations. Most of this article is a series of responses to the recommendations from individuals across the spectrum from conservative to progressive. Here are some excerpts (warning: this blog is fair, but not balanced, so no attempt has been made to represent the full breadth of opinion present in the article):

  • Due to my commitment to the gospel, my understanding of Scripture and the voice of my conscience, I grieve that the report suggests that my brothers and sisters in Christ in faithful, same-gender relationships can’t be full partners in the ELCA. In the spirit of recommendation one, I will continue to “concentrate on finding ways to live together faithfully in the midst of our differences.”
    Herbert W. Chilstrom, ELCA presiding bishop, 1988 to 1994; St. Peter, Minn.
    (more…)

Part 2 – Social Security Reform

Sunday, February 6th, 2005

My previous post on this topic argued that Social Security is not a retirement savings plan, but a retirement insurance plan, or even, dare we say, a social welfare plan. A fair question following that post would be: okay, but why can’t we achieve the same goal with a private savings plan? Can’t we let people invest their own money as they wish, and achieve the same result?

There are several problems with this approach to guaranteeing a minimal income to our seniors. First, let’s consider investment risk. Many critics of Social Security point to the trust fund and the fact that it only invests in treasury bonds, which don’t yield as high a return as the stock market or other investments. A problem with this criticism is that the investment return on the Social Security trust fund has no impact whatsoever on your Social Security benefits. Social Security benefits are based on your average annual income, not on investment income in the trust fund. Once again, the Social Security system is not a savings plan, it is designed to tax today’s workers to pay for today’s retiree’s benefits. (more…)

Another Bush Deception — Social Security Reform

Saturday, February 5th, 2005

Social Security is viewed by much of the US public as a nationalized retirement savings plan where money is taken out of their paycheck and invested on their behalf awaiting the day when they retire . (For international readers — Social Security is the US pensions system.) As a blog sponsored by the Club for Growth says:

As I’ve said countless times, no private market investment product that had the same details as SS would be allowed to be sold. How many people would send their insurance company $10,000 each year for 40+ years, not be able to touch it or have any accounting for how it is being invested, and then, even after starting to receive some payments from the insurance company, when they die, allow everything to go to the insurance company?

If Social Security is just a government-run savings plan, and a bad one at that, why not privatize? (more…)

Blogophilia

Saturday, February 5th, 2005

What I’m reading in the blogs…

Vaughn Thompson at Ichthus has some posts (this one, and this, and this) on Time’s cover story on the top 25 evangelicals. What struck me about the article was how many of the evangelicals were quoted about poverty and hunger instead of abortion and gay marriage. Also, what is it with Tim LaHaye?

Also at Ichthus, Vaughn picks up his series on the Purpose-Driven Life. I know that several members of my congregation found this book very helpful in their spiritual journey, but Vaughn is approaching it with a more critical eye.

Chuck Currie and FaithForward have posts on a disgusting theological assault on our faith masquerading as righteousness. This is the worst of the worst.

Last Supper by Marithé and GirbaudChris Tessone at Progressive Protestant has a post with an update linking to a parody of DaVinci’s Last Supper. What struck me in this Guardian article is that in its description of the photo, it says “One man, John the Baptist, sits on a woman’s lap, his torso bare and jeans riding low.” So John the Baptist was at the Last Supper? Interesting display of secular ignorance of Christianity. I agree with Chris…the picture is pretty cool.

Finally, a wonderful post from Father Jake, using Jesus’ own words to remind us that dialogue is not always possible.

Christine Todd Whitman and the Sincerest Form of Flattery

Tuesday, February 1st, 2005

After consulting with our in-house legal staff here at iamachristiantoo.org, I have decided not to pursue legal recourse for copyright infringement against Christie Todd Whitman, even though she has clearly attempted to confuse the public into thinking that her new book, It’s My Party, Too: The Battle for the Heart of the GOP and the Future of America, is somehow related to this blog. It is a sad day when some unknown author like Ms. Whitman tries to take advantage of the vast popularity of this blog in the hopes that it will keep her book out of the half-off bin at Borders. She even has a me-too web site, MyPartyToo.com. Puhleeeeze.

(If you find yourself scratching your head at the moment, click here.)

Yes, Christie Todd Whitman’s book has a very similar title to that of this blog, and for the same reason: while the far right has taken over my religion, it has also taken over her political party. Here is an excerpt from the transcript of her appearance on Scarborough Country. (more…)